Ana içeriğe atla

The Tale of Human Evolution

The Tale of Human Evolution

The subject most often brought up by advocates of the theory of evolution is the subject of the origin of man. The Darwinist claim holds that man evolved from so-called ape-like creatures. During this alleged evolutionary process, which is supposed to have started four to five million years ago, some “transitional forms” between man and his imaginary ancestors are supposed to have existed. According to this completely imaginary scenario, four basic “categories” are listed:

  1. Australopithecus
  2. Homo habilis
  3. Homo erectus
  4. Homo sapiens

Evolutionists call man’s so-called first ape-like ancestors Australopithecus, which means “Southern ape”. These living beings are actually nothing but an ape species that has become extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, shows that these apes belonged to an ordinary ape species that became extinct and bore no resemblance to humans (SOURCE)

Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as “homo”, that is, “man.” According to their claim, the living beings in the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus. Evolutionists devise an imaginary evolution scheme by arranging different fossils of these creatures in a particular order. This scheme is imaginary because it has never been proven that there is any evolutionary relationship between these different classes.

By outlining the chain’s links as Australopithecus > Homo habilis > Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of these species is another’s ancestor. However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists have revealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus all lived at different parts of the world at the same time (SOURCE)

Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus have lived up until very modern times. Homo erectus and Homo sapiens co-existed in the same region and era. (SOURCE)

This situation indicates the invalidity of the claim that they are ancestors of one another. The late Stephen Jay Gould explained this deadlock of the theory of evolution, although he was himself one of the leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth century:

What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionary trends during their tenure on earth. (SOURCE)

Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is “upheld” with the help of various drawings of some “half ape, half human” creatures appearing in the media and textbooks, that is, frankly, propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.

Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scientists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.

Zuckerman also made an interesting “spectrum of science” ranging from those he considered scientific to those he considered unscientific. According to Zuckerman’s spectrum, the most “scientific” – that is, depending on concrete data – fields of science are chemistry and physics. After them come the biological sciences and then the social sciences. At the far end of the spectrum, which is the part considered to be most “unscientific“, are “extra-sensory perception” – concepts such as telepathy and a sixth sense – and finally “human evolution”. Zuckerman explains his reasoning:

We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fields of presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or the interpretation of man’s fossil history, where to the faithful [evolutionist] anything is possible – and where the ardent believer [in evolution] is sometimes able to believe several contradictory things at the same time. (SOURCE)

The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the prejudiced interpretations of some unearthed fossils by certain people who blindly adhere to their theory.


The Tale of Human Evolution
BritishDeepState.net
https://britishdeepstate.tumblr.com/post/168955677462

Etiketler

Etiketler:

Yorumlar

Yorum Gönder

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

We see the members of the British Deep State creeping around Mr. ERDOGAN. He will never be left alone in his great struggle. Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)

via Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/Becc1jbFIwm/
Yorum Gönder
Devamı

Homosexuality is danger for all people… Families are the...

Homosexuality is danger for all people… Families are the fundamental building blocks of society. In order for a society to flourish and remain healthy, the family should consist of a father and a mother who are able to produce and give rise to children. However, there is a rising trend in many Western countries, which is intrinsically in contradiction to what is considered a normal society: same-sex marriage. As of late, being modern and classy in society requires freedom, which is definitely true, but according to the changing western cultures and values that includes acceptance of same-sex marriage. Furthermore, many activists promote homosexuality as another human rights issue that must undeniably be protected. Some endeavor deliberately to oppose religious values and merits while some are misguidedly following them in order to be hip, modern, trendy and in tune with their notion of what a new modern culture should consist of. They are usually unaware of the damage it is imposing ...
Yorum Gönder
Devamı

The British deep state uses the PKK and bigotry in their plan of destroying Turkey ADNAN OKTAR: In 1880s, the British hatred of the Turks spread also to America. But of course the British started it first. Senator Loch of the USA speaks exactly like the British. He says that: "Istanbul must be taken away from the Turks." One of the regions that they want to be autonomous is Istanbul. They want to separate Marmara region from Turkey and include it in Europe. And the presidency system is the means to accomplish what they want; by creating autonomous regions, federations and separating Istanbul. "The Turks, who are the seeds of plague, bringers of war and an insult to their neighbors, must be banished from Europe." he says. There is a British mentality in such ruthless hatred. This is the mentality of the British government. So they use the PKK to put this malice into action. In a top-secret document dated 1911, the prime minister of England, Lord Salisbury states this: "The same charade, the same Ottoman mentality continues. These ignorant fanatical people, this barbaric nation want to abolish the capitulations as well. Turks will always remain Turks; they will never be Europeanized." This is the reason they won't let us be a member of the EU. But let's spoil this game. Let's turn Turkey into a really modern, high quality, European country. Let's wipe out bigotry. Bigotry is the result of the British politics, the policies of the British deep state. Turning the people of a country into bigots is enough to destroy a country. Then, the country destroys itself anyway. Hatred against women emerges and arts, science, aesthetics cease to be. A traditionalist Orthodox conservative system takes over. And then that state, that nation collapses. This is the secret politics of the British deep state. We can dispose of this politics by arts, science, aesthetics, beauty, quality and being above European standards. In those times, Britain convinced France, which was of the same mind. They got Russia on board as well and together they found the triple entente in 1907. This was one of the first steps of Britain towards its aim of separating the Ottoman Empire.

via Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/BfEE7vNlUrt/
Yorum Gönder
Devamı