Ana içeriğe atla

The Tale of Human Evolution

The Tale of Human Evolution

The subject most often brought up by advocates of the theory of evolution is the subject of the origin of man. The Darwinist claim holds that man evolved from so-called ape-like creatures. During this alleged evolutionary process, which is supposed to have started four to five million years ago, some “transitional forms” between man and his imaginary ancestors are supposed to have existed. According to this completely imaginary scenario, four basic “categories” are listed:

  1. Australopithecus
  2. Homo habilis
  3. Homo erectus
  4. Homo sapiens

Evolutionists call man’s so-called first ape-like ancestors Australopithecus, which means “Southern ape”. These living beings are actually nothing but an ape species that has become extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, shows that these apes belonged to an ordinary ape species that became extinct and bore no resemblance to humans (SOURCE)

Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as “homo”, that is, “man.” According to their claim, the living beings in the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus. Evolutionists devise an imaginary evolution scheme by arranging different fossils of these creatures in a particular order. This scheme is imaginary because it has never been proven that there is any evolutionary relationship between these different classes.

By outlining the chain’s links as Australopithecus > Homo habilis > Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of these species is another’s ancestor. However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists have revealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus all lived at different parts of the world at the same time (SOURCE)

Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus have lived up until very modern times. Homo erectus and Homo sapiens co-existed in the same region and era. (SOURCE)

This situation indicates the invalidity of the claim that they are ancestors of one another. The late Stephen Jay Gould explained this deadlock of the theory of evolution, although he was himself one of the leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth century:

What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionary trends during their tenure on earth. (SOURCE)

Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is “upheld” with the help of various drawings of some “half ape, half human” creatures appearing in the media and textbooks, that is, frankly, propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.

Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scientists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.

Zuckerman also made an interesting “spectrum of science” ranging from those he considered scientific to those he considered unscientific. According to Zuckerman’s spectrum, the most “scientific” – that is, depending on concrete data – fields of science are chemistry and physics. After them come the biological sciences and then the social sciences. At the far end of the spectrum, which is the part considered to be most “unscientific“, are “extra-sensory perception” – concepts such as telepathy and a sixth sense – and finally “human evolution”. Zuckerman explains his reasoning:

We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fields of presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or the interpretation of man’s fossil history, where to the faithful [evolutionist] anything is possible – and where the ardent believer [in evolution] is sometimes able to believe several contradictory things at the same time. (SOURCE)

The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the prejudiced interpretations of some unearthed fossils by certain people who blindly adhere to their theory.


The Tale of Human Evolution
BritishDeepState.net
https://britishdeepstate.tumblr.com/post/168955677462
Etiketler:

Yorumlar

Yorum Gönder

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

The British deep state uses the PKK and bigotry in their plan of destroying Turkey ADNAN OKTAR: In 1880s, the British hatred of the Turks spread also to America. But of course the British started it first. Senator Loch of the USA speaks exactly like the British. He says that: "Istanbul must be taken away from the Turks." One of the regions that they want to be autonomous is Istanbul. They want to separate Marmara region from Turkey and include it in Europe. And the presidency system is the means to accomplish what they want; by creating autonomous regions, federations and separating Istanbul. "The Turks, who are the seeds of plague, bringers of war and an insult to their neighbors, must be banished from Europe." he says. There is a British mentality in such ruthless hatred. This is the mentality of the British government. So they use the PKK to put this malice into action. In a top-secret document dated 1911, the prime minister of England, Lord Salisbury states this: "The same charade, the same Ottoman mentality continues. These ignorant fanatical people, this barbaric nation want to abolish the capitulations as well. Turks will always remain Turks; they will never be Europeanized." This is the reason they won't let us be a member of the EU. But let's spoil this game. Let's turn Turkey into a really modern, high quality, European country. Let's wipe out bigotry. Bigotry is the result of the British politics, the policies of the British deep state. Turning the people of a country into bigots is enough to destroy a country. Then, the country destroys itself anyway. Hatred against women emerges and arts, science, aesthetics cease to be. A traditionalist Orthodox conservative system takes over. And then that state, that nation collapses. This is the secret politics of the British deep state. We can dispose of this politics by arts, science, aesthetics, beauty, quality and being above European standards. In those times, Britain convinced France, which was of the same mind. They got Russia on board as well and together they found the triple entente in 1907. This was one of the first steps of Britain towards its aim of separating the Ottoman Empire.

via Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/BfEE7vNlUrt/
Yorum Gönder
Devamı

A Tug of War

A Tug of War On November 27, 1922, the Finance and Economic Affairs Commission convened to discuss the capitulations and İsmet Pasha demanded that all the limitations that hindered the economic independence of Turkey be removed. He explained that a country cannot be independent with capitulations and that the situation of the foreigners in Turkey were already guaranteed with general laws that were in place as is the case in all civilized and independent countries, and that Turkish delegation would only accept being in a commission in line with these principles. (SOURCE) The French delegation, coming from a country that had made great profits out of capitulations, insisted that capitulations be replaced with another system. İsmet Pasha refused the offer, completely aware that the new and unknown system could jeopardize the security or independence of the state. Lord Curzon claimed that capitulations were based on rights given by the treaty and that even the Germans, the ally of the
Yorum Gönder
Devamı

The Capitulation Plans of the British Deep State

The Capitulation Plans of the British Deep State While studying the capitulations, we must keep in mind that the British deep state makes deep plans that extend well into the next centuries. This is what happened with the capitulations and the British deep state managed to extend the scope of the original concessions granted to Britain over time, abusing the Ottoman Empire’s kindness and weakness to build a separate structure within the Ottoman Empire. In the end, foreign courts were operating on Ottoman territory, foreigners were parceling out, buying, and selling the Ottoman lands; and even the best medical service was given by foreign doctors to foreigners. These foreigners in question who became more privileged than Turks on Turkish lands, were in fact looting the state and led lives fully independent of Ottoman laws. Since these people had more rights than Turkish merchants, they began to dominate the trade in the country. This system was the application of the sly plan of the
Yorum Gönder
Devamı