Ana içeriğe atla

The Complex Structure of Life

The Complex Structure of Life

The primary reason why evolutionists ended up at such a great impasse regarding the origin of life is that even those living organisms Darwinists deemed to be the simplest have outstandingly complex features. The cell of a living thing is more complex than all our man-made technological products. Today, even in the most developed laboratories of the world not even a single protein of a cell, let alone a living cell itself, can be produced by bringing non-living materials together.

The conditions required for the formation of a cell are too great in quantity to be explained away by mere coincidence. However, there is no need to explain the situation with too many details. Evolutionists are at a dead-end even before reaching the stage of the cell. That is because the probability of just a single protein, an essential building block of the cell, coming into being by chance is mathematically “0”.

The main reason for this is the need for other proteins to be present if one protein is to form, and this completely eradicates the possibility of chance formation. This fact by itself is sufficient to eliminate the evolutionist claim of chance right from the outset. To summarize,

  1. Proteins cannot be synthesized without enzymes, and enzymes are all proteins.
  2. Around 60 proteins assuming the task of an enzyme need to be present for a single protein to be synthesized. Therefore, proteins are essential for proteins to exist.
  3. DNA manufactures the protein-synthesizing enzymes. Proteins cannot be synthesized without DNA. DNA is therefore also needed for proteins to form.
  4. All the organelles in the cell have important tasks in protein synthesis. In other words, for proteins to form, a complete and fully functioning cell needs to exist with all its organelles.

Evolutionist science writer Brian Switek admitted that the origin of life remains to be unaccountable by evolutionists as follows:

How life began is one of nature’s enduring mysteries. (SOURCE)

Harvard chemist George Whitesides made the following confession in his acceptance speech of the Priestley Medal, the highest award of the American Chemical Society:

The Origin of Life. This problem is one of the big ones in science. … Most chemists believe, as do I, that life emerged spontaneously from mixtures of molecules in the prebiotic Earth. How? I have no idea. (SOURCE)

The DNA molecule, located in the nucleus of a cell and which stores genetic information, is a magnificent databank. If the information coded in DNA were transcribed on paper, it would make a giant library consisting of an estimated 900 volumes of 500 pages each.

A very interesting insurmountable predicament emerges at this point for the evolutionists: DNA can replicate itself only with the help of some specialized proteins (enzymes). However, the synthesis of these enzymes can be realized only by the information coded in DNA. As they both depend on each other, they must exist at the same time for replication. This razes the scenario where life originated by itself to the ground. Prof. Leslie Orgel, an evolutionist of repute from the University of San Diego, California, confesses this fact in the September 1994 issue of the Scientific American magazine:

It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time. Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other. And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means. (SOURCE)

No doubt, if it is impossible for life to have originated spontaneously through blind coincidence, then it must be accepted that life was created. This fact explicitly invalidates the theory of evolution, whose main purpose is to deny Creation.


The Complex Structure of Life
BritishDeepState.net
https://britishdeepstate.tumblr.com/post/168956857102
Etiketler:

Yorumlar

Yorum Gönder

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

The British deep state uses the PKK and bigotry in their plan of destroying Turkey ADNAN OKTAR: In 1880s, the British hatred of the Turks spread also to America. But of course the British started it first. Senator Loch of the USA speaks exactly like the British. He says that: "Istanbul must be taken away from the Turks." One of the regions that they want to be autonomous is Istanbul. They want to separate Marmara region from Turkey and include it in Europe. And the presidency system is the means to accomplish what they want; by creating autonomous regions, federations and separating Istanbul. "The Turks, who are the seeds of plague, bringers of war and an insult to their neighbors, must be banished from Europe." he says. There is a British mentality in such ruthless hatred. This is the mentality of the British government. So they use the PKK to put this malice into action. In a top-secret document dated 1911, the prime minister of England, Lord Salisbury states this: "The same charade, the same Ottoman mentality continues. These ignorant fanatical people, this barbaric nation want to abolish the capitulations as well. Turks will always remain Turks; they will never be Europeanized." This is the reason they won't let us be a member of the EU. But let's spoil this game. Let's turn Turkey into a really modern, high quality, European country. Let's wipe out bigotry. Bigotry is the result of the British politics, the policies of the British deep state. Turning the people of a country into bigots is enough to destroy a country. Then, the country destroys itself anyway. Hatred against women emerges and arts, science, aesthetics cease to be. A traditionalist Orthodox conservative system takes over. And then that state, that nation collapses. This is the secret politics of the British deep state. We can dispose of this politics by arts, science, aesthetics, beauty, quality and being above European standards. In those times, Britain convinced France, which was of the same mind. They got Russia on board as well and together they found the triple entente in 1907. This was one of the first steps of Britain towards its aim of separating the Ottoman Empire.

via Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/BfEE7vNlUrt/
Yorum Gönder
Devamı

A Tug of War

A Tug of War On November 27, 1922, the Finance and Economic Affairs Commission convened to discuss the capitulations and İsmet Pasha demanded that all the limitations that hindered the economic independence of Turkey be removed. He explained that a country cannot be independent with capitulations and that the situation of the foreigners in Turkey were already guaranteed with general laws that were in place as is the case in all civilized and independent countries, and that Turkish delegation would only accept being in a commission in line with these principles. (SOURCE) The French delegation, coming from a country that had made great profits out of capitulations, insisted that capitulations be replaced with another system. İsmet Pasha refused the offer, completely aware that the new and unknown system could jeopardize the security or independence of the state. Lord Curzon claimed that capitulations were based on rights given by the treaty and that even the Germans, the ally of the
Yorum Gönder
Devamı

The Capitulation Plans of the British Deep State

The Capitulation Plans of the British Deep State While studying the capitulations, we must keep in mind that the British deep state makes deep plans that extend well into the next centuries. This is what happened with the capitulations and the British deep state managed to extend the scope of the original concessions granted to Britain over time, abusing the Ottoman Empire’s kindness and weakness to build a separate structure within the Ottoman Empire. In the end, foreign courts were operating on Ottoman territory, foreigners were parceling out, buying, and selling the Ottoman lands; and even the best medical service was given by foreign doctors to foreigners. These foreigners in question who became more privileged than Turks on Turkish lands, were in fact looting the state and led lives fully independent of Ottoman laws. Since these people had more rights than Turkish merchants, they began to dominate the trade in the country. This system was the application of the sly plan of the
Yorum Gönder
Devamı